Comments on: We’re Living Web 2.0; Why Aren’t We Using Browser 2.0?

By: What a Writer is Reading on the Web, 4/6/08 | Real Words

What a Writer is Reading on the Web, 4/6/08 | Real Words — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:30:27 +0000

[...] We’re Living Web 2.0; Why Aren’t We Browsing 2.0? @ Copywriter Underground [...]

By: Darren Neimke's Live Portal: A Weekend Read - 8

Darren Neimke's Live Portal: A Weekend Read - 8 — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 05:42:46 +0000

[...] We’re Living Web 2.0; Why Aren’t We Using Browser 2.0? – I agree that there’s a long way forward with browser innovation now. I’m not sure that IE8 is a big step forward though. [...]

By: superk

superk — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:16:47 +0000

I tried to use Flock when it just came out a while ago (a year?) and didn’t see any main differences with Fireofox, plus it crashed lamely.

Will give it a whirl tonight though. As for eCorral, didn’t know about it, will test it too.

As for that “bookmarks” thing… I’ve been using del.icio.us for quite some time now and don’t find useful to have traditional bookmarks anymore. Only for family stuff that my wife and kids might find easier to use. But for my stuff, del.icio.us is the way to go. Bookmar anywhere. Use anywhere.

By: Formula 1 racing » We’re Living Web 2.0; Why Aren’t We Using Browser 2.0?

Formula 1 racing » We’re Living Web 2.0; Why Aren’t We Using Browser 2.0? — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:37:19 +0000

[...] Mom at 35 wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick extract [...]

By: Tom Chandler

Tom Chandler — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:35:50 +0000

Laura; I’ve used both on and off, and they work pretty well, though I’m not what you call a heavy consumer of rich media.

Compatibility is a bit of a tough issue on the Internet; even Firefox and IE suffer some problems.

By: Laura Spencer

Laura Spencer — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 13:30:05 +0000

Very interesting Tom. Thanks for sharing these tools with us. I had never heard of either browser.

Have you spent much time on them? Have you encountered compatibility problems?

By: Tom Chandler

Tom Chandler — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:27:03 +0000

Joshua: Your link-building tip was handy. I think Flock could grow into something interesting.

Roland: Thanks for the handy work-around. Unfortunately, it’s not quite the same in Flock, which I’m beginning to think is a better version of Firefox (though it’s not in quite the same league as eCorral).

By: 1 de abril de 2008

1 de abril de 2008 — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:04:26 +0000

[...] Por qué no estamos usando un navegador web 2.0? [...]

By: Roland Head

Roland Head — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:07:14 +0000

eCorral sounds interesting but I’ve long since used one of Firefox’s standard features to deal with managing groups of pages relating to a topic I’m researching.

If you choose to “Bookmark All Tabs” on the Bookmarks menu, you can save all the open tabs to a single (new) folder in your bookmarks. There is a similar feature to open them all at once – which if done in a new window serves the purpose well.

Roland

By: Joshua Clanton - Design for the WEB

Joshua Clanton - Design for the WEB — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:52:07 +0000

Personally, I've been using Flock for several months now, and find it hard to go back to vanilla Firefox. It isn't the social interactivity that I find most useful, though. It's the web toolbar and ease of bookmarking. Together they save me tons of time.