While I’ve written a lot of direct response projects over my 22+ year career, I’ve happily avoided getting myself and my clients in trouble.
That’s because I’m a staunch advocate of ethical marketing practices, and long been an outspoken critic of deceptive mailing practices.
In an age of increasingly jaded customers, deceptive marketing practices harden customers, eventually harming all marketers — especially those marketing fairly.
That’s whyBRANDWEEK sourced me when they wrote a story about the growing practice of deceptive mailings. While they ran several quotes, this stood out:
“The public is exposed to so many messages that when a growing percentage of those messages turn out to be deceptive, the result is yet another upward ratchet in consumer cynicism,” said Tom Chandler, a 20-year ad copywriter and consultant based in Mount Shasta, Calif., who operates ChandlerWrites.com. “That growing suspicion of marketers and brands has become so profound, some companies can’t even get customers to open envelopes containing real documents.”
Delight, Don’t Deceive
The rule here is simple: rather than deceive, why not delight recipients with a novel or creative approach?
Most deceptive marketing practices rely heavily on fear appeals. Unfortunately, the psychology of fear is well understood; the next time fear is falsely used as a motivator, you’ll need more of it to get the same response.
Where, exactly, will that end?
There’s also the larger question of brand value; as a proponent of engagement marketing, I must ask why anyone would risk their brand?
“What I don’t understand is why organizations allow deceptive practices to undermine their carefully [and expensively] cultivated brand images in the first place,” said Chandler. “I recently received a series of envelopes from a large credit-card bank where I held an account. All shared the same alarmist stamp that “Important Information” about his account was enclosed. “Of course, it wasn’t important information,” Chandler said. “It was a series of cross-selling pitches. After a month or two, I canceled my account.”
The Ethical Marketer
Every seasoned copywriter I’ve ever spoken to has a similar story; a chilling encounter with a client pushing them very, very hard to do something unethical.
In the moment, it’s always tempting to succumb, reasoning the work’s unsigned and nobody will know (how I wish copywriters received the credit/blame for their work).
Believe me, you’ll know.
Of course, one marketer’s “deceptive” is another’s fair game. And where that line should be drawn is never clear, though one thing is; if marketers keep stepping over that line, eventually regulation will be created that limit those transgressions (and probably do it poorly).
As copywriters, we are responsible for our work, and blaming clients for “making” us engage in deceptive practices is simply a wonky moral dodge.
Keep writing, Tom Chandler.
Comments 5
Tom, keeping it real (hackneyed, I know) ultimately is the most effective marketing message there is. If we subscribe to the notion that every touch is the beginning of a relationship based on mutual respect, why deceive? Ultimately, it’s just bad business … not to speak of the even worse karma.
Yikes. Add one ridiculous indemnification clause and a writing contract to the mix and you’ve got a recipe for disaster where the writer is on the legal hook for that deceptive copy. I run away from these clients.
Roberta: I tell clients authenticity is one of the cornerstones of a successful, long-term customer relationship. Eyes often glaze over, but snap back into focus when you discuss the lifetime value of customers vs one-time buyers.
Is that how we express the concept of “karma” to our clients?
Janet: That’s an excellent point, and liability is an under-explored subject in the copywriter’s world. Still, I’m more concerned about additional legislation aimed at marketers, which probably won’t help anyone.
Good Show, Tom. If the product has merit,its benefits will tell the story. Deception may result in a quick sale, but inevitably turns off a disappointed buyer who undoubtedly will hesitate before buying blindly again. Beware, the threat of government policing always hovers above us.
Charles: I agree — deception is a bad long-term tactic, especially for anyone interested in the long-term survival of their brand.
Post a Comment